Roger W. Sperry Hayatı

Roger W Sperry

Kaynak dil:

Hedef dil:

My adult scientific career began with graduate study in chemical physics with Harden McConnell at Stanford I had the idea of elucidating the mechanism of ion transport across biological membranes by nuclear resonance I thought ion transport must involve rotation of the transport protein in the membrane Struggling to prove this wrong idea, it occurred to me to study the rotation in the membrane of a lipid molecule, about 1,000 molecular weight, rather than a protein fifty times larger This led to my discoveries, by nuclear and paramagnetic resonance methods, of phospholipid flip-flop, an exceedingly slow process, and lateral diffusion, exceedingly fast (Kornberg and McConnell, 1971a ; Kornberg and McConnell, 1971b)

For postdoctoral work, I wanted to learn about the other important method of physico-chemical analysis of macromolecules, X-ray diffraction The obvious choice was the Laboratory of Molecular Biology (LMB) in Cambridge, where protein crystallography was developed and still most intensively practiced at the time I went in the spring of 1972 to work with Aaron Klug, who was not only a leading crystallographer, but also responsible for the application of Fourier methods to electron microscopy and image processing While looking for a problem to study by X-ray diffraction, I got to know Mark Bretscher, the only person at the LMB interested in membrane structure, and he suggested reading a paper just published by Francis Crick titled "A General Model for Higher Organism Chromosomes" (Crick, 1971) Figure 3 of that paper was a diagram showing a loop of DNA crossed by a dashed line, said to symbolize a histone molecule When I raised the subject with Aaron Klug, he immediately produced a sheaf of papers on the X-ray analysis of chromosomal material, or "chromatin," known for nearly a century to contain roughly equal weights of histones and DNA Aaron had discussed the interpretation of the X-ray pattern of chromatin extensively with Francis, and he encouraged me to pursue the problem He warned me, however, that it was a "messy" problem

Notorious might have been a better word Many had succumbed to the allure of the problem, with its potential for insight into genetic chemistry, only to be frustrated by the intractability of the histones These proteins were, on the one hand, surprisingly simple, and on the other hand, hopelessly complicated There are only five types of histone, designated H1, H2A, H2B, H3, and H4 Upon isolation, however, the individual histones proved to be extraordinarily sticky, binding avidly to DNA and interacting with one another in every possible combination Whereas the X-ray diffraction pattern of chromatin was indicative of repeating order, the biochemical behavior of the histones did not appear to explain it There was, moreover, sufficient variation in the relative amounts of the histone types in various tissues and organisms "to make the idea of a unique repeating order untenable" (Huberman, 1973) The histones came to be regarded as a kind of amorphous glue, coating the chromosomal DNA, with no obvious significance

I began by repeating the work of others, isolating the individual histones, mixing them in various combinations with DNA, and recording X-ray diffraction patterns I also scoured the literature and came across two papers that influenced my thinking A paper by Hewish and Burgoyne reported the cleavage of about 10% of chromosomal DNA by an endogenous nuclease in isolated rat liver nuclei to multiples of a unit size (Hewish and Burgoyne, 1973) When I mentioned this to Francis Crick, he shot off a letter to Hewish inquiring about the size The reply came from Burgoyne, giving the sedimentation coefficient of the unit length of DNA Assuming the measurement was made under alkaline conditions, as was customary for sedimentation analysis of RNA, much studied at the LMB at the time, the value from Burgoyne corresponded to about 500 bases This unit size did not relate to any other information about chromatin, and the appearance of multiples of the unit size simply confirmed what we already knew from X-ray diffraction, that chromatin contained some amount of repeating substructure

The second paper, by van der Westhuyzen and von Holt, reported the extraction of histones from chromatin by mild methods, rather than with strong acid or other harsh treatment, as was customary at the time (van der Westhuyzen and von Holt, 1971) Mild methods failed to resolve the histones entirely from one another, so the paper was ignored What attracted my attention was the clean separation of the mildly extracted histones into two groups, H2A/H2B, and H3/H4 This separation contrasted with the promiscuous interactions of the histones previously observed I realized this promiscuity was likely attributable to the denaturation of histones during isolation in the past From the data in the paper, I could also deduce that the H3/H4 group behaved as if twice the size of the H2A/H2B group, although all four individual histone proteins were about the same size I concluded that H3 and H4 must form a dimer, and I thought I might crystallize and solve the structure of this unique histone oligomer

What followed was truly astounding I measured the molecular weight of the purified H3/H4 preparation by equilibrium ultracentrifugation, while Jean Thomas offered to analyze the material by chemical cross-linking Both methods showed unequivocally that H3 and H4 were in the form of a double dimer, an (H3)2(H4)2 tetramer (Kornberg and Thomas, 1974) I pondered this result for days, and came to the following conclusions (Kornberg, 1974) First, the exact equivalence of H3 and H4 in the tetramer implied that the differences in relative amounts of the histones from various sources measured in the past must be due to experimental error This and the stoichiometry of the tetramer implied a unit of structure in chromatin based on two each of the four histones, or an (H2A)2(H2B)2(H3)2(H4)2 octamer Second, since chromatin from all sources contains roughly one of each histone for every 100 bp of DNA, a histone octamer would be associated with 200 bp of DNA Finally, the (H3)2(H4)2 tetramer was reminiscent of hemoglobin, an a2b2 tetramer The X-ray structures of hemoglobin and other oligomeric proteins available at the time were compact, with no holes through which a molecule the size of DNA might pass Rather, the DNA in chromatin must be wrapped on the outside of the histone octamer

As I turned these ideas over in mind, it struck me how I might explain the results of Hewish and Burgoyne What if their sedimentation coefficient of unit length DNA fragments was measured under neutral rather than alkaline conditions? Then the DNA would have been double stranded and about 250 bp in length Allowing for the approximate nature of the result, the correspondence with my prediction of 200 bp was electrifying Then I recalled a reference near the end of the Hewish and Burgoyne paper to a report of a similar pattern of DNA fragments by Williamson I rushed to the library and found that Williamson had obtained a ladder of DNA fragments from the cytoplasm of necrotic cells and measured the unit size by sedimentation under neutral conditions: the result was 205 bp! I was euphoric In the months and years to follow, it was often pointed out how thin was the support for my ideas and how extended the line of reasoning, but I never really doubted the conclusions The prediction of the DNA unit size and its verification convinced me completely

Support for a particulate substructure of chromatin came from electron microscopy and from nuclease digestion and sedimentation analysis Some work on these lines was done even before my own, and though not definitive, was nicely coincident with my ideas In the years to follow, with colleagues in Cambridge, I proved the existence of the histone octamer and the equivalence of the 200 bp unit with the particle seen in the electron microscope (Kornberg, 1977) This chapter of the chromatin story concluded with the X-ray crystal structure determination of the particle, now known as the nucleosome, showing a histone octamer surrounded by DNA, in near atomic detail (Luger et al, 1997)

İngilizce dilinden Türkçe diline çeviri

Doğum Yeri ve Aile: Francis Bushnell ve Florence Kraemer Sperry Elmwood, küçük bir banliyösünde 20 Ağustos 1913, Hartford, Connecticut tarihi Baba bankacılık, işletme okulu ve babasının ölümünden sonra eğitimli anne, ben 11 yaşında iken, o yerel lise müdürü asistanı oldu Bir kardeşi Russell Loomis, genç bir yıl, kimya girdi Norma Gay Deupree, 28 Aralık 1949 ile evliydi Biz, bir oğlu Glenn Michael (Tad), 13 Ekim 1953 doğumlu ve 18 Ağustos 1963 doğumlu bir kızı, Janeth Umut var

Eğitim: Benim erken okula Elmwood, Connecticut ve William Hall West Hartford, Connecticut Yüksek Okulu oldu 4 yıllık Amos C Miller Burs Oberlin College katıldı 1935 yılında İngilizce olarak AB aldıktan sonra, ben Profesör RH Stetson altında bir Psikoloji Yüksek Lisans, 1937, Oberlin 2 yıl daha kaldı Daha sonra doktora Zooloji anahtarı hazırlamak için Oberlin at büyük bir ek üçüncü yıl aldı Chicago Üniversitesi'nden Profesör Paul A Weiss altında çalışmak Doktora aldıktan sonra Chicago, 1941 yılında Harvard Üniversitesi'nde Profesör Karl S Lashley altında bir Ulusal Araştırma Konseyi Üyesi olarak bir yıl doktora sonrası araştırma yaptı

Profesyonel konumları: Primate Biyoloji (1942-1946) Yerkes Laboratuvarları Biyoloji araştırma görevlisi, Harvard Üniversitesi, Anatomi Anabilim Dalı, Yardımcı Doçent, Chicago Üniversitesi (1946-1952), Doçent psikoloji, Chicago Üniversitesi (1952-1953 ) Bölüm Şefi, Nörolojik Hastalıklar ve Körlük, Ulusal Sağlık Enstitüleri (1952-1953); ilaç bağımlılığıyla Hixon profesör, California Institute of Technology (1954-present)

Ödüller: Amos C Miller Bursu, Oberlin College (1931-1935); Ulusal Araştırma Konseyi Bursu (1941-42); Değerli Mezunlar Citation; Oberlin College (1954), Ulusal Bilimler Akademisi (1960) seçildi; Seçilmiş American Academy Howard Crosby Warren Madalyası, Deneysel Psikologlar Derneği (1969);; Seçkin Bilimsel Katkı Ödülü, American Psychological Association (1971); Yıl Ödülü (1972) Kaliforniya Bilim Adamı; Co-alıcı William Thomson Wakeman Araştırma, Sanat ve Sosyal Bilimler (1963) Ödülü, Ulusal Parapleji Vakfı (1972); Bilim derece Onursal Doktor, Cambridge Üniversitesi (1972), Amerikan Felsefe Topluluğu (1974) seçildi; Onursal Üyesi Amerikan Nöroloji Derneği (1974) seçildi; Passano Tıp Bilim (1973) Ödülü Co- Alıcı Claude Bernard Bilim Gazetecilik Ödülü (1975), Amerikan Felsefe Topluluğu Karl Lashley Ödülü (1976), Royal Society (1976) Seçilmiş Dış Üye Science Lisans Fahri Doktora, University of Chicago (1976), Papalık Akademisi üyesi seçildi Bilimler (1978) Bilim Derecesi, Kenyon Koleji (1979) Onursal Doktor Tıp Wolf Ödülü (1979); Ralph Gerard Ödülü Nörobilim Derneği (1979), Uluslararası Görsel Okuryazarlık Derneği Özel Ödülü (1979), Albert Lasker Tıp Araştırma Ödülü (1979), American Academy of Achievement Golden Plate Ödülü (1980) Bilim Derecesi, Rockefeller Üniversitesi (1980) Onursal Doktor

Mesleki ve anti-beyin-gerinim: ilkokulda toplanan ve büyük bir Amerikan güveler kaldırdı Ran tuzak hattı ve lise yıllarında canlı vahşi Evcil toplanır Üç harfli, yüksek okul ve üniversite üniversite takımı atletizm adam Orta ömrü sayesinde heykel, seramik, figür çizimi, spor, Amerikan halk dansı, tekne, balıkçı, şnorkel, suluboya, ve alışılmadık fosillerin toplanması da dahil olmak üzere akşam ve hafta sonu şaşırtma faaliyetleri devam etti - biz dünyanın en büyük 3 ammonit için bir rakip var bunların arasında